Does Revenue Sharing Work?
July 8, 2010
Revenue sharing is used to entice prospective employees to join the company. It can also be used to drive schedule progress. Some companies want to use it to develop a certain corporate culture. But does revenue sharing programs work and under what set of conditions can it succeed? Here is a story of a medium sized company that experimented with such a program.
Brian, the CEO of a privately held company, didn’t want to dilute the equity in the company and didn’t want to give new employees stock options as part of their compensation package. The company stock was held only by the original founders. The company was poised to go IPO in the next year and wanted to offer stock only after the company became public. But Brian felt he had to offer prospective employees something that would make their company’s job offers look as attractive as all those other companies offering stock options. At the same time, Brian didn’t want to increase the salary offers in order to conserve cash and wanted to bind the employees to the company for several years with the promise of some future bonus. The company also had a high turnover rate among employees. Brian wanted to alleviate the churn and subsequent disruption to the development process. Brian’s solution was to offer revenue sharing as a substitute for stock options.
The revenue sharing plan had limits and restrictions. Brian didn’t want the employees to get too much from this plan, but enough to entice them to join and motivate them to work hard during the course of the project. First, it only applied to the development staff. Second, it only applied to the revenue from projects that the employees were assigned to. Third, the amount that any employee could collect was based upon how much revenue the company realized from the product and was limited to $3,000 per employee, which was less than 5% of the employee’s annual salary. The amount an employee received was based upon management’s opinion about how much each employee contributed to the program. Fourth, employees would only collect if they were still employed by the company when revenue became available.
How did the prospective employees react to this idea?
Not one prospects ever included this issue when negotiating their compensation package. On the other hand, prior to implementing the revenue sharing program, human resources were often questioned about why the company didn’t offer stock options because these prospects had offers from other companies that did. So while the program didn’t entice people to join, the prospects did consider the job offers more seriously since it responded to the issue of the lack of stock options.
Did the revenue sharing plan keep the employees motivated to work hard?
No, not one employee ever mentioned the revenue sharing plan while the project was ongoing. This program didn’t encourage them to work harder to reach their schedule milestones. The managers concluded it did not motivate employees in the short-term.
How did the employees react when it was time to receive their revenue sharing checks?
Everyone likes to receive unexpected money and this is exactly how employees viewed it. Interesting enough, not all the employees on a project participated in the revenue sharing program; only employees who joined the project in the first year of development were considered eligible. Employees who were not eligible were not happy campers when others received checks and they didn’t.
What did the rest of the company think?
This program was first implemented with two new projects. The company itself had other ongoing development projects. It wasn’t long before employees in those other projects learned that those assigned to these two new projects would be earning something more. This just added to the tension between the development groups which often had to share resources.
Where did the concept go wrong?
Development projects in this company took three years to complete, and then it took another year to realize revenue so the employees weren’t going to receive checks for four years. The reward was too far out in the future to motivate the employees in the here and now. Second, the amount of money was too small to encourage people to stay. When employees resigned and took a new position, they easily made up the amount in the salary increase from the new job offer. Lastly, it became a management and human resource nightmare to track which employees worked on which projects and who was eligible for which product’s revenue sharing program.
What ultimately happened?
Since it didn’t seem to entice employees to join, the program was eventually discontinued. In order to motivate employees to accomplish tasks in accordance with the schedule, a quarterly bonus program was implemented. Employees set their own quarterly milestones. Of course, the managers checked the milestones in order to make sure they were reasonable. The experienced project leaders set the quarterly goals for the college hires, who were not able to determine their own goals. Based upon how much of their goals employees accomplished by the end of the quarter, employees collect a proportionate amount of their maximum bonus. This program worked quite well in getting employees to achieve their goals.
Filed under: Funny Stories and Humor,Management,Team Building







12 Comments Leave a Comment
1.
forex robot | July 12, 2010 at 4:08 am
Great site. A lot of useful information here. I’m sending it to some friends!
2.
dental hygienist | July 13, 2010 at 2:08 am
Great information! I’ve been looking for something like this for a while now. Thanks!
3.
government grants | July 15, 2010 at 4:21 am
It’s posts like this that keep me coming back and checking this site regularly, thanks for the info!
4.
medical assistant | July 16, 2010 at 2:56 pm
Terrific work! This is the type of information that should be shared around the web. Shame on the search engines for not positioning this post higher!
5.
Equity Compensation | September 27, 2010 at 10:55 am
Companies are forever wanting ways to attract good workers, particularly in key positions the spot that the choices made could have a profound have an effect on long lasting profitability. Offering stock from the company, at least an opportunity to shop for stock, has shown to be about the most effective incentives. Beforehand to ensure available as a average option, which delivers the legal right to buy stock in the future in the price determined at the beginning, or it is usually available as restricted stock purchase that can always deliver some value unless the company becomes bankrupt.
6.
Administrator | September 28, 2010 at 2:15 pm
From my persoanl expereince, I found stock options only retain start-up employees under select circumstances. Founders are incented with stock options, but the typical employees of seed or early stage aren’t motivated by them. Mostly because they are often taking a pay cut to join the start-up, and they know the odds of them ever being worth something are small and the pay off can be years away. Seasoned start-up employees view stock option as a bonus plan. What does seem to work is when the start-up has been recently been acquired and gone IPO, where the options take on some immediate tangible value. The other circumstance is when the start-up receives a funding round and its an up round, but in today’s environment, down rounds are much more common. I’m not sure it’s works as incentive to attract top talent these days either. The big reason top talent was always willing to get involved with a Silicon Valley start-up was the vibrant job market. I often heard start-up talent say that if the start-up didn’t work out, it was okay because they could easily find a new job quickly. These days, top talent is reluctant to join a start-up becuase the odds of quickly finding another job are much less likely. I would be curious as to your experience in regards to start-ups.
7.
Prudential Realty | January 28, 2011 at 1:48 am
I at all times follow this blog, I find it truly well structured. Congratulations to the writer of the blog
8.
Luella Gidcumb | July 23, 2011 at 11:52 pm
I assume your readers may appreciate you writing more about this. This is always a great article, but it is not as in-depth as I’d have wanted to find.
9.
layer 3 switch | November 17, 2011 at 8:29 pm
Thank you a lot for giving everyone remarkably terrific chance to read articles and blog posts from this web site. It is usually very good and jam-packed with fun for me personally and my office mates to search your blog at a minimum three times in a week to study the new guidance you have. And indeed, I’m so certainly astounded with the unbelievable thoughts served by you. Some 4 points in this article are definitely the simplest we have ever had.
10.
Christopher McDaniel Interview | April 2, 2012 at 10:13 pm
Its such as you learn my mind! You appear to know so much about this, like you wrote the guide in it or something. I feel that you just can do with a few % to pressure the message home a little bit, but instead of that, this is excellent blog. An excellent read. I’ll certainly be back.
11.
piscine ultra frame intex | April 21, 2012 at 6:51 am
You’re very intelligent. You realize thus considerably relating to this subject, produced me personally consider it from a lot of varied angles. Your own stuffs excellent. Keep it up!
12.
Melania Toscano | July 21, 2012 at 7:34 am
We are a gaggle of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your site offered us with useful info to work on. You’ve done an impressive job and our entire group will probably be grateful to you.
Leave a Comment
TrackBack URL | RSS feed for comments on this post.